normande: the sustainable and quality breed

8 10 2010

Last week World Dairy Expo, the annual mecca of the dairy industry, drew thousands of people (and 2,411 cattle) to Madison.  I translated Spanish at international registration during the expo, but on the last day I had some time to roam around the grounds.

I stopped by the white tent housing the Grazing Pavillion on the far end of the South parking lot. It’s so far away from the hub of the showring, the barns, and the grilled cheese stand that it’s almost an all too perfect metaphor for the division between conventional and local/organic agriculture.

Four speckled dairy cattle were relaxing in the pavilion, seemingly unaware of the attention their colorful markings garnered from passerbyers. The green banners above them read: ”Normande: the sustainable and quality breed.”

 

The two Normandes cows to the far left are from the Vosberg farm in South Wayne, Wis. The two Normande cows on the right are from the Wogsland farm in Scandinavia, Wis.

 

 

Branding a cow as sustainable–what an interesting idea.  What makes a cow sustainable?  A poster at the Normande Genetics booth listed these qualities under “sustainability”:

  • excellent forage converter
  • exceptional fertility
  • body condition and sturdiness
  • reliable genetics: 120 bulls tested per year

Two of the Normande cows at Expo were from the farm of Barbara Wogsland, a dairy farmer and board member of the North American Normande Association. Barbara has a background in raising Holsteins, but when she saw a photo of a Normande in a magazine six years ago, she thought they were the “neatest looking cow.” The splotchy coloring is what made most people stop and stare at World Dairy Expo, too.

“I don’t why it is, but 90 percent of the time it’s women that are attracted to Normandes,” Barbara said.

Normandes can be white, brown, black, red and often are spotted and brindled (streaked with a different color). Barbara said most people she spoke with had never seen a cow with brindling before.

 

Brindling kind of looks like tiger stripes. Kind of.

 

Okay, it actually looks like this:

 

You can see subtle red streaks, or brindling, on this Normande bull.

 

Barbara initially purchased one Normande cow as a novelty, but she was so pleased with the cow’s performance that she bought Normande semen from France to start crossbreeding her Holsteins. In terms of milk production, the Normandes make a little less pounds of milk, but have a higher percent of butter fat and protein.

What about sustainability?

“They’re a smaller cow that’ll eat less compared to a Holstein and still give you a richer product. They’re known to be very good grazers. Those are all traits that would make an animal more sustainable.”

Plus the value of bull calves is greater, since they’re more “beefy” than other dairy cattle. That’s not surprising, considering Normande is a dual-purpose breed, which means the breed has both dairy animals and beef animals.

 

This is Sprinkles, one of my original Normandes, and her calf from 2009.

 

 

I started raising Normande beef cattle in 2003 after learning about the breed online. Call me shallow but, like everyone else, what caught my eye was their looks. I always anticipate calving season, because I never know what color calves my Normandes will surprise me with.

And, like Barbara, I soon realized there’s more to Normandes than the pizzazz of pretty hair. They’re moderate-sized hardy grazers that are easy to work with. After purchasing my first Normande heifer, I started cross-breeding my Polled Hereford cows to Normande bulls.  First generation crosses generally keep the Hereford look, while adding eye patches and/or spots to the white face. The Normande genetics also adds more body depth and length.

 

 

This is Wendy, a half-Normande/half-Polled Hereford heifer calf born this summer.

 

I’m still not sure about calling cows sustainable.  I think cattle can be raised in sustainable ways.  And certain cattle traits can make sustainable practices easier to accomplish.  But cattle themselves?  Let me ruminate on this.





sustainability: the power is yours

23 09 2010

I care about environmental stewardship on farms because it is one piece of something bigger: sustainability.

We seem to be adding “sustainable” to a lot of things: sustainable woodsustainable sushisustainable ball point pens, sustainable rodent control strategies (not kidding).  And then, of course, there’s agricultural sustainability.

Now, agricultural sustainability is a touchy subject.  If you like the term, you’re very enthusiastic about it.  If you don’t care for it, you’re very enthusiastic about that as well.

These are three common attitudes I’ve encountered when it comes to ag. sustainability:

1)  Hallelujah! Let’s start a revolution in agriculture and improve environmental stewardship.

2)  Ka-ching. The more consumer demand, the more moola I can make.  Sure, I care about the environment but this just makes business sense.

3)  Not buyin’ this. Sustainable agriculture?  This term is completely pointless.  Obviously agriculture is sustainable otherwise we wouldn’t still be doing it.

In a post on the Progressive Farmer website last week, Chris Clayton shared insights from a meeting on a National Research Council report, “Toward Sustainable Agricultural Systems in the 21st Century.”  The title of Clayton’s post was “Sustainable Ag Goals Hard to Reach.” He writes:

It was an interesting exercise with people talking about all of the various elements the drive sustainability, along with the understanding that, well, there are a lot of different definitions for sustainability.

Bingo. Definitions of agricultural sustainability are a’plenty.  That’s because talking about sustainability inevitably leads to talking about values.  What I value is different than what you value.  I use the term “agricultural sustainability” all the time, but if you ask me for a definition I’d probably struggle to come up with a definite one.

Sustainability.  What does that even mean?  What are we sustaining?

Us.

We’re sustaining the human population.  Even if we tack on “agriculture” before the word, it’s still about us (who are we kidding, it’s always about us).  We’re sustaining agriculture to sustain us.

If sustainability is about us, then shouldn’t we have everyone on board?  Agricultural sustainability shouldn’t be a source of division.

Clayton ends his meeting recap with this:

I don’t think sustainable agriculture advocates have done a good job of marrying the goals of feeding the world, affordably, and address this laundry list that researchers and academics want to see in the environment and society from producers.

It seems sometimes people not on the sustainable agriculture bandwagon expect those that are to have some Captain Planet-like powers that will save the world.  There will never be a perfect solution.  I don’t think we can discredit those interested in agricultural sustainability based on the fact that they have not provided everyone else with some foolproof formula.

We can, however, recognize that while we have different values we do share common ground: we are all passionate about agriculture and we want it be a part of our future.  It takes personal initiative to set aside any biases you have about sustainable or conventional agriculture in order to focus on this common ground.

As Captain Planet would say, the power is yours.

Check out this high quality artwork! I put my class doodling to good use with this one. More to come.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.